Current:Home > NewsKat Von D wins lawsuit over Miles Davis tattoo, says her 'heart has been crushed' by trial -TruePath Finance
Kat Von D wins lawsuit over Miles Davis tattoo, says her 'heart has been crushed' by trial
View
Date:2025-04-19 02:17:40
LOS ANGELES — Celebrity tattoo artist Kat Von D did not violate a photographer's copyright when she used his portrait of Miles Davis as the basis for a tattoo she'd inked on a friend's arm, a jury decided Jan. 26.
The Los Angeles jury deliberated for just over two hours before deciding that the tattoo by the "Miami Ink" and "LA Ink" alum — born Katherine von Drachenberg — was not similar enough to photographer Jeffrey Sedlik's 1989 portrait of the jazz legend that she needed to have paid permission.
"I'm obviously very happy for this to be over," Von D, who inked her friend's arm with Davis as a gift about seven years ago, said outside the courtroom. "It's been two years of a nightmare worrying about this, not just for myself but for my fellow tattoo artists."
Von D also said that despite the victory, she's not enthused about getting back to work.
"I think I don't want to ever tattoo again; my heart has been crushed through this in different ways," she said. "We'll see with time."
Kat Von D's lawyer calls copyright lawsuit 'ridiculous'
The eight jurors made the same decision about a drawing Von D made from the portrait to base the tattoo on, and to several social media posts she made about the process, which were also part of Sedlik's lawsuit.
And they found that the tattoo, drawing and posts also all fell within the legal doctrine of fair use of a copyrighted work, giving Von D and other tattoo artists who supported her and followed the trial a resounding across-the-board victory.
"We've said all along that this case never should have been brought," Von D's attorney Allen B. Grodsky said after the verdict. "The jury recognized that this was just ridiculous."
Sedlik's attorney, Robert Edward Allen, said they plan to appeal.
Why photographer Jeffrey Sedlik sued Kat Von D: 'No one's art is safe'
Allen said the images, which both featured a close-up of Davis gazing toward the viewer and making a "shh" gesture, were so similar he didn't know how the jury could reach the conclusion they did.
"If those two things are not substantially similar, then no one's art is safe," Allen said.
He told jurors during closing arguments earlier Friday that the case has "nothing to do with tattoos."
"It's about copying others' protected works," Allen said. "It's not going to hurt the tattoo industry. The tattoo police are not going to come after anyone."
Allen emphasized the meticulous work Sedlik did to set up the shoot, to create the lighting and mood, and to put Davis in the pose that would make for an iconic photo that was first published on the cover of JAZZIZ magazine in 1989. Sedlik registered the copyright in 1994.
And he said that subsequently, licensing the image to others including tattoo artists was a major part of how he made his living.
Kat Von D finds spiritual rebirth:Watch her get baptized after giving up witchcraft practice
Kat Von D says her tattoos are a form of 'fan art'
Von D said during the three-day trial that she never licenses the images she recreates, and she considers work like the Davis tattoo a form of "fan art."
"I made zero money off it," she testified. "I'm not mass-producing anything. I think there is a big difference."
Her attorney, Grodsky, emphasized for jurors that that lack of an attempt to cash in on the image was essential to the tattoo being a form of fair use, an exception in copyright law used for works including commentary, criticism and parody.
Allen argued in his closing that the social media posts about the tattoo were a promotion of her and her studio, and thus a form of monetizing the image.
If jurors had sided with Sedlik, they could have awarded him as little as a few hundred dollars or as much as $150,000.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- A Malibu wildfire prompts evacuation orders and warnings for 20,000, including Dick Van Dyke, Cher
- Taylor Swift makes history as most decorated artist at Billboard Music Awards
- Mystery drones are swarming New Jersey skies, but can you shoot them down?
- Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- One Tech Tip: How to protect your communications through encryption
- Dick Van Dyke credits neighbors with saving his life and home during Malibu fire
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Supreme Court allows investors’ class action to proceed against microchip company Nvidia
Ranking
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Save 30% on the Perfect Spongelle Holiday Gifts That Make Every Day a Spa Day
- US weekly jobless claims unexpectedly rise
- Taylor Swift makes history as most decorated artist at Billboard Music Awards
- The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
- Turning dusty attic treasures into cash can yield millions for some and disappointment for others
- Stop & Shop is using grocery store kiosks to make digital
- The burial site of the people Andrew Jackson enslaved was lost. The Hermitage says it is found
Recommendation
Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
Taxpayers could get $500 'inflation refund' checks under New York proposal: What to know
Hate crime charges dropped against 12 college students arrested in Maryland assault
Stock market today: Asian stocks are mixed ahead of key US inflation data
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
Chiquis comes from Latin pop royalty. How the regional Mexican star found her own crown
American who says he crossed into Syria on foot is freed after 7 months in detention
'September 5' depicts shocking day when terrorism arrived at the Olympics